M10 the Greens (aka The Hatch)

November 28, 2006

rhodes-ends.jpg

The final pack up has been a shocker… But it’s good to finally be leaving! This lingering around has got a bit much. There have been loads of lasts (like the last drink at the rat, last sleep at the hatch, etc…). It’s been a great four years, which has definitely left its mark.

packing.jpg

 


Drawing inspiration from Lord of the Rings quotes!!!

November 21, 2006

It has become a tradition since first year to watch motivational clip’s from movies before an exam. A famous scene that we watched a lot was the helms deep battle where this quote comes from:

“Yes. Yes! The horn of Helm Hammerhand shall sound in the deep, one last time.”

And given that this is my last exam at Rhodes this definitely applies… It’s going to be good to be finished (or in Lord of the Rings style; to ride out and meet them)!


Exam Lunch…

November 13, 2006

exam-lunch1.jpgGregor found these great German vienna sausages (typical), so we have been eating them constantly for lunch over the past few days! They are perfect for a quick lunch…

It’s a pity we didn’t find them earlier on in the year! Damn…. (Ya mom i know they are probably not the most healthy food, but its exams)! Also finally cracked Gran’s the Romans said it all quote:
CERVISIA POTA, PULCHRITUDO CERNITUR, translated it’s : I’ll have another, Barman!


South African Bank Fee Charges!

November 2, 2006

I carried out a research project on:

BANKS APPEAR TO BE GENERATING MORE INCOME FROM CHARGING FEES THAN FROM THEIR MORE TRADITIONAL FORMS OF INCOME

Abstract:
Banks’ strategy is changing in focus from traditional (on-balance sheet) to non-traditional (off-balance sheet) forms of business. Fee charges fall under the category of non-interest income (or non-traditional bank business) which is replacing interest income (or traditional bank business). A comparison between non-interest and interest income is undertaken for the big four banks of South Africa, which confirms that this shift is taking place. Competition is also analyzed based on an international comparison of fees and market concentration. Within the big four banks of South Africa there is very little competition in pricing of fees.

Basically the results showed that the banking environment in South Africa is not competitive in the national payment system (NPS). In South Africa, five of the biggest banks account for 89.2 percent of the value and a further 97.7 percent of the volume within the payment system, showing their dominance of the payment system. Therefore this case shows the clear lack of contestability in the custodian process, which definitely raises fears of cartel arrangements (or Collusive oligopoly).

I mention this because today the Competition Commission’s banking enquiry public hearings into bank fees and the national payment system (NPS) began. Nedbank was the first to present their views. It was interesting that they spoke about reducing their fee charges (but wait last year they charged the highest fees)! So essentially all Nedbank’s reduction means is that they are now in line with what other banks are charging!

Figure 7: Country Comparisons of Number of Banks, GDP Per Capita and Population Density Per sq Km

bank-competition1.jpg 

An interesting trend captured by figure 7 is that the developed countries have a lot more banks in their financial systems than developing countries. It is also interesting to note that South Africa is one of the more developed countries of the developing countries and has the least amount of banks after Morocco, indicating that it is perhaps under banked.